![redaksi maxim indonesia redaksi maxim indonesia](https://www.tagar.id/Asset/uploads2019/1579852860278-ojol-maxim.jpg)
Legal Formalisme and Legal Realism: What is The Issue. Hegel Reconsidered: Beyond Metaphysics and The Authoritarian State. (2016) The Cost of Justice: A Critique of Criminal Justice Rhetoric. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.Įchewija, S. Berkeley: Center Of The Study Of Law And Society, Jurisprudence And Sosial Policy Program Berkeley University.ĭworkin, R.
![redaksi maxim indonesia redaksi maxim indonesia](https://riauaktual.com/application/views/web/berita/83010377315-img_660_442_1577605880pung.jpg)
To Render Justice : Models Of Justice In The International Criminal Tribunal For The Former Yugoslavia. In another hand, fiat justitia ne pereat mundus falls in post positivism paradigm which consider law is imperfect, interpretation is possible, no separation of law and morality and interdisciplinary approch is opened. Paradigmatically, fiat justicia ruat caelum and fiat justitia pereat mundus fall in positivism paradigm, consider rule is perfect, no interpretation, separation of law and morality, impossibility of interdisciplinary approach. In contrast, fiat justitia ne pereat mundus consider law is valid when it is according to the purpose and agrarian justice exist when it bring out prosperity for all people. The agrarian justice is achieved when the law is enforced as the text and its acontextual. Concluded that fiat justitia ruat caelum and fiat justitia pereat mundus is part of legal formalism. This is a normative juridical research, use conceptual and historical approach with secondary data then qualitatively analysed. Both of those maxim are paradigmatically analysed. This article analyse the meaning of fiat justitia ruat caelum and fiat justitia ne pereat mundus as well as its relation to agrarian justice and its contextuality. Maxim is a short sentence with deep meaning related to value and purpose of law include agrarian law.